Friday, October 1, 2010

Simple Math

I joined the message board where I met Jeanne, five years ago.  I joined because of the support offered after the loss of my daughter.  I met Jeanne on the women's group about four years ago.  How can I have been stalking her all over the internet for 8 years when I didn't know who she was 8 years ago?  8 years ago I was living in California and didn't belong to any message boards at all.

Shame on whoever has been stalking Jeanne in my name since before I knew her.  Or maybe she just needs to work on her Math.

By the way, I know it's been said ad nauseum here but this is the kind of thing that makes me wonder if Jeanne really is who she says she is.  I can't believe she's a teacher and can't tell the difference between a four year online interaction, and 8 years of stalking.

I've been stalked on the internet.  And I blog for a site that has a response blog.  A response blog is not stalking.

8 comments:

  1. Wait a sec... I thought SHE was the one calling you on Skype. And she is the one who has followed YOU around and ends up getting banned for trolling. She was banned from Ovusoft how many times? And the Speakeasy? Don't even get me started.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're right, Genevieve. What's funny is that on Skype, she added me. It popped up on my end as a request from her. And while she says that I called her (why would I do that?), the reverse is true. It pops up on my end with an accept call box. How could I accept a call if she was placing it? The truth is that she placed the call so that she could yell at me to shut down this blog.

    Joining Facebook is not stalking her. I didn't even know she was on MySpace. I've had a page there forever, but I never check it. Facebook is where it's at.

    Maybe she's confused on the definition of stalking.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have record that you placed the call and I have record of you pretending that you couldn't hear me. I have record that you faked being on the phone because you do not want to agree that I am a real person. I know how to work this. I am shutting down the blog and leaving it this week. I am only going to post the Sunday readings. period. I have record of when you began posting on Ovusoft. That was in 2002. You started to get mad in early to mid 2003. The speakeasy is not a big deal. Mary Ann Rogan has a problem. The Republicans are God to her. Sad. At least she didn't get a blog imitation of mine.

    It is sad. You will not know nor find out where my new blog is. It is in another language. I speak three.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jeanne, you really don't have any of that. I was on the phone with my friend J., who has followed all of this with interest. She heard the whole exchange. I wasn't faking anything. I believe you're a real person, I'm just not sure you're the person you claim to be. I like to think you're making this persona up for fun. And if you are, you're certainly keeping me entertained.

    My friend J. (the one I was on the phone with when you placed the call to me, because it wouldn't say for me to accept the call if I'd placed it) told me about Ovusoft in 2005 after the death of my baby, because they had loss support forums. I joined in May or June of 2005. Maybe someone has been bothering you since 2002, but it wasn't me. So, you simply don't have a record of it. Period. You can't have a record of something I didn't do.

    I did get mad at you when you went off on some very nice ladies on a message board who'd never done a thing to you except finally ask you to leave the group because your posting was so inflammatory. And even that they tried to do in the kindest way possible. No one wanted to hurt your feelings, they just wanted the group to be a supportive place, and you felt the need to insult them all the time.

    You'd like to say I'm stalking you because that makes you sound like the victim. But the truth is that you harassed me on Ovusoft to such a degree that you were finally banned after wishing me harm. You've tried to come back several times, and every time, they've had to re-ban you.

    I started this blog for the simple purpose of discussing your thoughts and posts, something that I couldn't do on your blog. That's fine, it's your right to post what you wish and allow the comments you wish. I believe in your right to free speech. But this is my little corner of the blogosphere where I can answer some of (what I believe to be) the outrageously off-the-wall posts you put up. And like I said, you can't bully me into taking it down.

    Congratulations on your new blog. Nothing could make me happier than seeing your old one become defunct.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have record of everything for Court in our district of Florida.

    Cease and desist or see a legal action against what you are doing. There really is a stalking law in Florida. I have warned you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jeann, again, you can't have evidence of things that simply haven't happened. I have read through the stalking laws for Florida, just out of curiosity. You're right, they do exist. Sadly, starting my own blog does not qualify as stalking, or cyber-stalking.

    This blog is not malicious, nor does it contain any threats to your person (something I would never dream of doing). You can read the law for yourself here: http://www.ncvc.org/src/main.aspx?dbID=DB_Florida108

    The plain fact is, Jeanne, you're here, interacting with me. That's not stalking. But that you think this qualifies, is very amusing to me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jeanne, you have your facts mixed up. I have been a member at Ovusoft since 2000. I was a member of the loss buddy group at the time Anne joined it, as my son died in January, and her daughter died in February. I also remember your harassment of her, and of whole "buddy groups" on the site. Time and time again you were calmly and politely requested to stop, and you refused, in fact your harassment and negative behavior continued to escalate.

    Eventually your behavior led to you being banned from the site. As I recall, you were banned for making threats of bodily ham against another user (Anne, coincidentally). After being banned, you still refused to abide by the rules, and you came back, only to be banned again each time.

    Coming back to harass people after you have been banned from a board for harassment is typical of stalking behavior. Creating a separate blog to address defamatory posts made about someone who is not allowed to comment on the defamatory remarks is not stalking.

    Threatening bodily harm to someone, looking up their personal info and physical address looks a WHOLE lot more like stalking than addressing wacky comments on a blog. I wonder what your precious Florida court system would think about it?
    From the Florida laws:
    (a) "Harass" means to engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that causes substantial emotional distress in such person and serves no legitimate purpose.
    (I'd say responding to defamatory remarks constitutes a "legitimate purpose" for this blog, not sure what "legitimate purpose" posting the original defamatory remarks serves on your part)
    (b) "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct." Such constitutionally protected activity includes picketing or other organized protests.
    (I wonder if constantly creating message board IDs for four years after being banned is a "course of conduct" or not?)
    (c) "Credible threat" means a threat made with the intent to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety. The threat must be against the life of, or a threat to cause bodily injury to, a person.
    (Threatening to throw someone to alligators for the entertainment of watching them be eaten IS admittedly pretty silly, but it shows a heart of malice and violence towards the person that is VERY un-Christian. Why did you think this threat was an appropriate way to treat a fellow human being?)

    ReplyDelete
  8. BTW- I'm the J she's talking about Jeanne. You're facts are totally whacked. Sorry.

    Oh, and she was totally on the phone with me when you Skyped her. I heard the whole conversation. In fact, I could hear YOU yelling in my friend's ear. You called her. Don't try to deny it.

    ReplyDelete